Where you live
Enter your ZIP code or street address to find your county below and the people who decide this for you, by name. SourceLine does not keep the address.
Ranked from doing best
Every county in Texas
| Margin of error | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Chambers County | 71.3% | plus or minus 8.2 points | 81.6% |
| 2 | Guadalupe County | 71.2% | plus or minus 5.5 points | 77.8% |
| 3 | Bastrop County | 69.2% | plus or minus 8.7 points | 76.5% |
| 4 | Fort Bend County | 67.8% | plus or minus 1.8 points | 77% |
| 5 | Ellis County | 67.6% | plus or minus 3.8 points | 75.8% |
| 6 | Rockwall County | 67.1% | plus or minus 2.6 points | 82.5% |
| 7 | Kaufman County | 64.7% | plus or minus 1.7 points | 78.1% |
| 8 | Rusk County | 64.3% | plus or minus 6.1 points | 78.8% |
| 9 | Brazoria County | 63.7% | plus or minus 2.4 points | 74.1% |
| 10 | Hardin County | 63.1% | plus or minus 7.5 points | 82.3% |
| 11 | Johnson County | 62.1% | plus or minus 5.3 points | 74.7% |
| 12 | Liberty County | 61.7% | plus or minus 9.1 points | 82.3% |
| 13 | Hays County | 60.6% | plus or minus 8.1 points | 64.1% |
| 14 | Henderson County | 60.6% | plus or minus 7.9 points | 77.8% |
| 15 | Wharton County | 57.9% | plus or minus 9.9 points | 72.3% |
| 16 | Cass County | 57.6% | plus or minus 6.6 points | 76.6% |
| 17 | Upshur County | 57.6% | plus or minus 6.4 points | 80.7% |
| 18 | Jasper County | 55.8% | plus or minus 8.2 points | 79% |
| 19 | Cherokee County | 54.1% | plus or minus 5 points | 74% |
| 20 | Hunt County | 53% | plus or minus 7.2 points | 71.3% |
| 21 | Montgomery County | 51.2% | plus or minus 3.2 points | 71.8% |
| 22 | Harrison County | 50.5% | plus or minus 4.5 points | 76.9% |
| 23 | Victoria County | 49.8% | plus or minus 8.1 points | 65.3% |
| 24 | Midland County | 49.7% | plus or minus 8.6 points | 67.6% |
| 25 | Robertson County | 49.2% | plus or minus 2.7 points | 72.4% |
| 26 | Smith County | 49.2% | plus or minus 2.6 points | 68.8% |
| 27 | Washington County | 48.7% | plus or minus 9.7 points | 69.8% |
| 28 | Williamson County | 46.2% | plus or minus 2.7 points | 66.4% |
| 29 | Jefferson County | 45% | plus or minus 1.9 points | 62.5% |
| 30 | Ector County | 44.4% | plus or minus 6.5 points | 64.7% |
| 31 | Galveston County | 44% | plus or minus 1.9 points | 67.6% |
| 32 | Bell County | 43.6% | plus or minus 2 points | 56.5% |
| 33 | El Paso County | 42.9% | plus or minus 3.1 points | 64.2% |
| 34 | Bexar County | 42.5% | plus or minus 1.9 points | 58.8% |
| 35 | Orange County | 42.3% | plus or minus 6.6 points | 75.2% |
| 36 | Limestone County | 42.2% | plus or minus 4.9 points | 72.1% |
| 37 | Collin County | 41.9% | plus or minus 1.8 points | 64.5% |
| 38 | Denton County | 41.1% | plus or minus 2.1 points | 65.5% |
| 39 | Navarro County | 41.1% | plus or minus 6.1 points | 69.4% |
| 40 | Lamar County | 41% | plus or minus 8.4 points | 66.1% |
| 41 | Anderson County | 40.3% | plus or minus 4.1 points | 72.3% |
| 42 | Nueces County | 40.1% | plus or minus 5.6 points | 59.7% |
| 43 | Taylor County | 39.1% | plus or minus 5.7 points | 60.5% |
| 44 | Gregg County | 39% | plus or minus 3.6 points | 60.3% |
| 45 | Bowie County | 38.7% | plus or minus 3.4 points | 63.4% |
| 46 | Houston County | 38.7% | plus or minus 6.9 points | 70.6% |
| 47 | Tom Green County | 38.1% | plus or minus 8.6 points | 65.1% |
| 48 | Walker County | 37.7% | plus or minus 7.6 points | 56.5% |
| 49 | Wichita County | 37.5% | plus or minus 5.7 points | 61.4% |
| 50 | Dallas County | 36.7% | plus or minus 0.9 points | 50.8% |
| 51 | Tarrant County | 36.6% | plus or minus 1 points | 59.3% |
| 52 | Harris County | 36.4% | plus or minus 0.8 points | 54.7% |
| 53 | Coryell County | 35.6% | plus or minus 6 points | 58.6% |
| 54 | Travis County | 35.2% | plus or minus 2.1 points | 52.1% |
| 55 | Waller County | 34.3% | plus or minus 8.4 points | 72% |
| 56 | Potter County | 33.7% | plus or minus 6.1 points | 57.3% |
| 57 | McLennan County | 32.8% | plus or minus 2.9 points | 61.8% |
| 58 | Nacogdoches County | 32.8% | plus or minus 5.9 points | 59.3% |
| 59 | Lubbock County | 30.2% | plus or minus 3.4 points | 55.5% |
| 60 | Grayson County | 29.9% | plus or minus 7.5 points | 66.8% |
| 61 | Angelina County | 29.7% | plus or minus 4.9 points | 64% |
| 62 | Brazos County | 27.4% | plus or minus 2.9 points | 46.8% |
| 63 | Randall County | 22% | plus or minus 7.2 points | 67.9% |
| Not ranked | Andrews County | Too small to report: fewer than 1,000 Black households | 78.5% | |
| Not ranked | Aransas County | Too small to report: fewer than 1,000 Black households | 76.8% | |
| Not ranked | Archer County | Too small to report: fewer than 1,000 Black households | 84.5% | |
| Not ranked | Armstrong County | Not published: too few people in the survey | 80.2% | |
| Not ranked | Atascosa County | Too small to report: fewer than 1,000 Black households | 77.4% | |
| Not ranked | Austin County | 65.8% Wide margin of error | plus or minus 12.8 points | 76.5% |
| Not ranked | Bailey County | Too small to report: fewer than 1,000 Black households | 79.9% | |
| Not ranked | Bandera County | Too small to report: fewer than 1,000 Black households | 85.9% | |
| Not ranked | Baylor County | Too small to report: fewer than 1,000 Black households | 66.2% | |
| Not ranked | Bee County | Too small to report: fewer than 1,000 Black households | 70.8% | |
| Not ranked | Blanco County | Too small to report: fewer than 1,000 Black households | 76.2% | |
| Not ranked | Borden County | Too small to report: fewer than 1,000 Black households | 66.3% | |
| Not ranked | Bosque County | Too small to report: fewer than 1,000 Black households | 75.8% | |
| Not ranked | Brewster County | Too small to report: fewer than 1,000 Black households | 62.5% | |
| Not ranked | Briscoe County | Too small to report: fewer than 1,000 Black households | 82.8% | |
| Not ranked | Brooks County | Too small to report: fewer than 1,000 Black households | 52.8% | |
| Not ranked | Brown County | Too small to report: fewer than 1,000 Black households | 68.3% | |
| Not ranked | Burleson County | Too small to report: fewer than 1,000 Black households | 81.7% | |
| Not ranked | Burnet County | Too small to report: fewer than 1,000 Black households | 76.3% | |
| Not ranked | Caldwell County | Too small to report: fewer than 1,000 Black households | 75.3% | |
| Not ranked | Calhoun County | Too small to report: fewer than 1,000 Black households | 77.3% | |
| Not ranked | Callahan County | Too small to report: fewer than 1,000 Black households | 80.9% | |
| Not ranked | Cameron County | Too small to report: fewer than 1,000 Black households | 65.2% | |
| Not ranked | Camp County | Too small to report: fewer than 1,000 Black households | 77.5% | |
| Not ranked | Carson County | Too small to report: fewer than 1,000 Black households | 79.2% | |
| Not ranked | Castro County | Too small to report: fewer than 1,000 Black households | 63.6% | |
| Not ranked | Childress County | Too small to report: fewer than 1,000 Black households | 71% | |
| Not ranked | Clay County | Too small to report: fewer than 1,000 Black households | 84% | |
| Not ranked | Cochran County | Too small to report: fewer than 1,000 Black households | 64.6% | |
| Not ranked | Coke County | Not published: too few people in the survey | 71.1% | |
| Not ranked | Coleman County | Too small to report: fewer than 1,000 Black households | 77.2% | |
| Not ranked | Collingsworth County | Too small to report: fewer than 1,000 Black households | 73.8% | |
| Not ranked | Colorado County | Too small to report: fewer than 1,000 Black households | 79.5% | |
| Not ranked | Comal County | 69.6% Wide margin of error | plus or minus 11.9 points | 76.6% |
| Not ranked | Comanche County | Not published: too few people in the survey | 80.4% | |
| Not ranked | Concho County | Not published: too few people in the survey | 80.5% | |
| Not ranked | Cooke County | Too small to report: fewer than 1,000 Black households | 71.8% | |
| Not ranked | Cottle County | Too small to report: fewer than 1,000 Black households | 83.2% | |
| Not ranked | Crane County | Too small to report: fewer than 1,000 Black households | 83.8% | |
| Not ranked | Crockett County | Not published: too few people in the survey | 73.7% | |
| Not ranked | Crosby County | Too small to report: fewer than 1,000 Black households | 68.8% | |
| Not ranked | Culberson County | Not published: too few people in the survey | 70.2% | |
| Not ranked | Dallam County | Not published: too few people in the survey | 64% | |
| Not ranked | Dawson County | Too small to report: fewer than 1,000 Black households | 70.6% | |
| Not ranked | Deaf Smith County | Too small to report: fewer than 1,000 Black households | 66.8% | |
| Not ranked | Delta County | Too small to report: fewer than 1,000 Black households | 82.8% | |
| Not ranked | DeWitt County | Too small to report: fewer than 1,000 Black households | 73.9% | |
| Not ranked | Dickens County | Too small to report: fewer than 1,000 Black households | 79.5% | |
| Not ranked | Dimmit County | Too small to report: fewer than 1,000 Black households | 66.5% | |
| Not ranked | Donley County | Too small to report: fewer than 1,000 Black households | 74.8% | |
| Not ranked | Duval County | Not published: too few people in the survey | 70.4% | |
| Not ranked | Eastland County | Too small to report: fewer than 1,000 Black households | 71.6% | |
| Not ranked | Edwards County | Not published: too few people in the survey | 87.9% | |
| Not ranked | Erath County | Too small to report: fewer than 1,000 Black households | 63.1% | |
| Not ranked | Falls County | 66.2% Wide margin of error | plus or minus 12.2 points | 76.5% |
| Not ranked | Fannin County | Too small to report: fewer than 1,000 Black households | 78.7% | |
| Not ranked | Fayette County | Too small to report: fewer than 1,000 Black households | 79.4% | |
| Not ranked | Fisher County | Too small to report: fewer than 1,000 Black households | 80.4% | |
| Not ranked | Floyd County | Too small to report: fewer than 1,000 Black households | 73.3% | |
| Not ranked | Foard County | Not published: too few people in the survey | 76% | |
| Not ranked | Franklin County | Too small to report: fewer than 1,000 Black households | 82% | |
| Not ranked | Freestone County | 57% Wide margin of error | plus or minus 11.1 points | 75.4% |
| Not ranked | Frio County | Too small to report: fewer than 1,000 Black households | 58.9% | |
| Not ranked | Gaines County | Too small to report: fewer than 1,000 Black households | 74.6% | |
| Not ranked | Garza County | Too small to report: fewer than 1,000 Black households | 70.5% | |
| Not ranked | Gillespie County | Too small to report: fewer than 1,000 Black households | 74.9% | |
| Not ranked | Glasscock County | Not published: too few people in the survey | 68.5% | |
| Not ranked | Goliad County | Too small to report: fewer than 1,000 Black households | 86.8% | |
| Not ranked | Gonzales County | Too small to report: fewer than 1,000 Black households | 66.2% | |
| Not ranked | Gray County | Too small to report: fewer than 1,000 Black households | 76.4% | |
| Not ranked | Grimes County | Too small to report: fewer than 1,000 Black households | 79.9% | |
| Not ranked | Hale County | Too small to report: fewer than 1,000 Black households | 60.5% | |
| Not ranked | Hall County | Too small to report: fewer than 1,000 Black households | 73.6% | |
| Not ranked | Hamilton County | Too small to report: fewer than 1,000 Black households | 78.7% | |
| Not ranked | Hansford County | Not published: too few people in the survey | 81.2% | |
| Not ranked | Hardeman County | Too small to report: fewer than 1,000 Black households | 73.9% | |
| Not ranked | Hartley County | Not published: too few people in the survey | 74.4% | |
| Not ranked | Haskell County | Too small to report: fewer than 1,000 Black households | 73.7% | |
| Not ranked | Hemphill County | Too small to report: fewer than 1,000 Black households | 71.1% | |
| Not ranked | Hidalgo County | 37.5% Wide margin of error | plus or minus 11.1 points | 67.5% |
| Not ranked | Hill County | Too small to report: fewer than 1,000 Black households | 78.2% | |
| Not ranked | Hockley County | Too small to report: fewer than 1,000 Black households | 72.2% | |
| Not ranked | Hood County | Too small to report: fewer than 1,000 Black households | 81.2% | |
| Not ranked | Hopkins County | 55.6% Wide margin of error | plus or minus 12.6 points | 71.1% |
| Not ranked | Howard County | Too small to report: fewer than 1,000 Black households | 69.5% | |
| Not ranked | Hudspeth County | Too small to report: fewer than 1,000 Black households | 73.6% | |
| Not ranked | Hutchinson County | Too small to report: fewer than 1,000 Black households | 83.3% | |
| Not ranked | Irion County | Not published: too few people in the survey | 82.8% | |
| Not ranked | Jack County | Too small to report: fewer than 1,000 Black households | 72.2% | |
| Not ranked | Jackson County | Too small to report: fewer than 1,000 Black households | 70.8% | |
| Not ranked | Jeff Davis County | Not published: too few people in the survey | 88% | |
| Not ranked | Jim Hogg County | Not published: too few people in the survey | 56.4% | |
| Not ranked | Jim Wells County | Too small to report: fewer than 1,000 Black households | 68.5% | |
| Not ranked | Jones County | Too small to report: fewer than 1,000 Black households | 80.4% | |
| Not ranked | Karnes County | Too small to report: fewer than 1,000 Black households | 62.4% | |
| Not ranked | Kendall County | Too small to report: fewer than 1,000 Black households | 79.5% | |
| Not ranked | Kenedy County | Not published: too few people in the survey | 52.7% | |
| Not ranked | Kent County | Not published: too few people in the survey | 79.2% | |
| Not ranked | Kerr County | Too small to report: fewer than 1,000 Black households | 70.1% | |
| Not ranked | Kimble County | Too small to report: fewer than 1,000 Black households | 78.9% | |
| Not ranked | King County | Not published: too few people in the survey | 59.5% | |
| Not ranked | Kinney County | Not published: too few people in the survey | 83.9% | |
| Not ranked | Kleberg County | Too small to report: fewer than 1,000 Black households | 52.5% | |
| Not ranked | Knox County | Too small to report: fewer than 1,000 Black households | 77.4% | |
| Not ranked | La Salle County | Not published: too few people in the survey | 76% | |
| Not ranked | Lamb County | Too small to report: fewer than 1,000 Black households | 74% | |
| Not ranked | Lampasas County | Too small to report: fewer than 1,000 Black households | 80.1% | |
| Not ranked | Lavaca County | Too small to report: fewer than 1,000 Black households | 78.3% | |
| Not ranked | Lee County | Too small to report: fewer than 1,000 Black households | 77.8% | |
| Not ranked | Leon County | Too small to report: fewer than 1,000 Black households | 76.6% | |
| Not ranked | Lipscomb County | Not published: too few people in the survey | 82.4% | |
| Not ranked | Live Oak County | Not published: too few people in the survey | 71.3% | |
| Not ranked | Llano County | Too small to report: fewer than 1,000 Black households | 76.5% | |
| Not ranked | Loving County | Not published: too few people in the survey | 11.1% | |
| Not ranked | Lynn County | Too small to report: fewer than 1,000 Black households | 77% | |
| Not ranked | Madison County | Too small to report: fewer than 1,000 Black households | 75.3% | |
| Not ranked | Marion County | Too small to report: fewer than 1,000 Black households | 78.5% | |
| Not ranked | Martin County | Too small to report: fewer than 1,000 Black households | 78.1% | |
| Not ranked | Mason County | Not published: too few people in the survey | 79.7% | |
| Not ranked | Matagorda County | 42.7% Wide margin of error | plus or minus 12.6 points | 68.1% |
| Not ranked | Maverick County | Too small to report: fewer than 1,000 Black households | 70.5% | |
| Not ranked | McCulloch County | Too small to report: fewer than 1,000 Black households | 66.6% | |
| Not ranked | McMullen County | Not published: too few people in the survey | 78.3% | |
| Not ranked | Medina County | Too small to report: fewer than 1,000 Black households | 83.8% | |
| Not ranked | Menard County | Not published: too few people in the survey | 80.7% | |
| Not ranked | Milam County | Too small to report: fewer than 1,000 Black households | 76.9% | |
| Not ranked | Mills County | Not published: too few people in the survey | 80.3% | |
| Not ranked | Mitchell County | Too small to report: fewer than 1,000 Black households | 78.7% | |
| Not ranked | Montague County | Not published: too few people in the survey | 79.9% | |
| Not ranked | Moore County | Too small to report: fewer than 1,000 Black households | 62.5% | |
| Not ranked | Morris County | 52.7% Wide margin of error | plus or minus 12.6 points | 73.9% |
| Not ranked | Motley County | Too small to report: fewer than 1,000 Black households | 76.5% | |
| Not ranked | Newton County | Too small to report: fewer than 1,000 Black households | 82.9% | |
| Not ranked | Nolan County | Too small to report: fewer than 1,000 Black households | 68.1% | |
| Not ranked | Ochiltree County | Not published: too few people in the survey | 72.7% | |
| Not ranked | Oldham County | Not published: too few people in the survey | 73.6% | |
| Not ranked | Palo Pinto County | Too small to report: fewer than 1,000 Black households | 71% | |
| Not ranked | Panola County | 72.8% Wide margin of error | plus or minus 10.4 points | 79.9% |
| Not ranked | Parker County | Too small to report: fewer than 1,000 Black households | 80.7% | |
| Not ranked | Parmer County | Too small to report: fewer than 1,000 Black households | 72.1% | |
| Not ranked | Pecos County | Too small to report: fewer than 1,000 Black households | 72% | |
| Not ranked | Polk County | 49% Wide margin of error | plus or minus 10.7 points | 78.1% |
| Not ranked | Presidio County | Too small to report: fewer than 1,000 Black households | 77.3% | |
| Not ranked | Rains County | Too small to report: fewer than 1,000 Black households | 82.6% | |
| Not ranked | Reagan County | Too small to report: fewer than 1,000 Black households | 70% | |
| Not ranked | Real County | Not published: too few people in the survey | 78.1% | |
| Not ranked | Red River County | 42.4% Wide margin of error | plus or minus 11.6 points | 71.5% |
| Not ranked | Reeves County | Too small to report: fewer than 1,000 Black households | 73.7% | |
| Not ranked | Refugio County | Too small to report: fewer than 1,000 Black households | 77% | |
| Not ranked | Roberts County | Too small to report: fewer than 1,000 Black households | 85.1% | |
| Not ranked | Runnels County | Too small to report: fewer than 1,000 Black households | 75% | |
| Not ranked | Sabine County | Too small to report: fewer than 1,000 Black households | 85.7% | |
| Not ranked | San Augustine County | Too small to report: fewer than 1,000 Black households | 75.1% | |
| Not ranked | San Jacinto County | Too small to report: fewer than 1,000 Black households | 84.6% | |
| Not ranked | San Patricio County | Too small to report: fewer than 1,000 Black households | 66.9% | |
| Not ranked | San Saba County | Not published: too few people in the survey | 71.7% | |
| Not ranked | Schleicher County | Too small to report: fewer than 1,000 Black households | 84.3% | |
| Not ranked | Scurry County | Too small to report: fewer than 1,000 Black households | 76.8% | |
| Not ranked | Shackelford County | Too small to report: fewer than 1,000 Black households | 78.7% | |
| Not ranked | Shelby County | 56.2% Wide margin of error | plus or minus 13.2 points | 74% |
| Not ranked | Sherman County | Not published: too few people in the survey | 76.3% | |
| Not ranked | Somervell County | Not published: too few people in the survey | 80% | |
| Not ranked | Starr County | Too small to report: fewer than 1,000 Black households | 69.5% | |
| Not ranked | Stephens County | Too small to report: fewer than 1,000 Black households | 79.2% | |
| Not ranked | Sterling County | Not published: too few people in the survey | 77.7% | |
| Not ranked | Stonewall County | Not published: too few people in the survey | 84.6% | |
| Not ranked | Sutton County | Not published: too few people in the survey | 76% | |
| Not ranked | Swisher County | Too small to report: fewer than 1,000 Black households | 66.4% | |
| Not ranked | Terrell County | Not published: too few people in the survey | 89.4% | |
| Not ranked | Terry County | Too small to report: fewer than 1,000 Black households | 66.5% | |
| Not ranked | Throckmorton County | Not published: too few people in the survey | 68% | |
| Not ranked | Titus County | 40.3% Wide margin of error | plus or minus 10.5 points | 70.6% |
| Not ranked | Trinity County | Too small to report: fewer than 1,000 Black households | 79.4% | |
| Not ranked | Tyler County | Too small to report: fewer than 1,000 Black households | 81.2% | |
| Not ranked | Upton County | Too small to report: fewer than 1,000 Black households | 77.2% | |
| Not ranked | Uvalde County | Too small to report: fewer than 1,000 Black households | 70.6% | |
| Not ranked | Val Verde County | Too small to report: fewer than 1,000 Black households | 69.1% | |
| Not ranked | Van Zandt County | Too small to report: fewer than 1,000 Black households | 81.5% | |
| Not ranked | Ward County | Too small to report: fewer than 1,000 Black households | 78.5% | |
| Not ranked | Webb County | Too small to report: fewer than 1,000 Black households | 64.7% | |
| Not ranked | Wheeler County | Too small to report: fewer than 1,000 Black households | 76.2% | |
| Not ranked | Wilbarger County | Too small to report: fewer than 1,000 Black households | 67.2% | |
| Not ranked | Willacy County | Not published: too few people in the survey | 74.7% | |
| Not ranked | Wilson County | Too small to report: fewer than 1,000 Black households | 84.7% | |
| Not ranked | Winkler County | Too small to report: fewer than 1,000 Black households | 86% | |
| Not ranked | Wise County | Too small to report: fewer than 1,000 Black households | 81.4% | |
| Not ranked | Wood County | Too small to report: fewer than 1,000 Black households | 80.1% | |
| Not ranked | Yoakum County | Not published: too few people in the survey | 66.8% | |
| Not ranked | Young County | Too small to report: fewer than 1,000 Black households | 74.1% | |
| Not ranked | Zapata County | Too small to report: fewer than 1,000 Black households | 72% | |
| Not ranked | Zavala County | Too small to report: fewer than 1,000 Black households | 69% |
Ranked: the 63 counties measured in survey years 2020 to 2024 with at least 1,000 Black households and with a margin of error of 10 points or less. Places below that line are still listed, with the reason.
Who decides
From you up to Congress. Look up your address above and each step fills in with the people who hold that seat for you.
You and your neighbors Know your rights as a renter or owner, check your property tax assessment, and show up when zoning is decided.
Ask: Is my assessment right, and when is the deadline to appeal it?
Your mayor, council and county commission Decide zoning, property taxes, code enforcement and how local housing money is spent.
Ask: What is being built here, who can afford it, and who decided?
Your state legislators Write landlord and tenant law and decide where the housing tax credit goes.
Ask: Where did our state place its housing tax credits last year?
Your members of Congress Fund rent help, public housing and the housing tax credit.
Ask: How long is the wait for rent help in our county?
What you can do
- This weekLook up your property assessment or reread your lease, and write down any deadline.
- The next date that mattersThe next zoning hearing or property tax appeal deadline in your county.
- Where your voice is countedRaise what matters where you live on SourceLine issues. Only confirmed residents are counted, and SourceLine shares the totals, never names, with the body that decides.
Method and sources
Black households that own their home. Source: Census Bureau, American Community Survey, survey years 2020 to 2024.
The margin of error is how far the true figure could be from the one shown. Surveys ask some people, not everyone, so smaller places have wider margins. A place with too few people to measure well is listed but not ranked.
Population, voting age population, citizens of voting age, registered voters and people who voted are different counts. Each page says which one it uses.
Who decides: the people named come from SourceLine’s record of officeholders for the address you enter. Where SourceLine hasn’t updated a level for your area yet, that step says so.