Skip to content

Our mission is to make sure Black communities are not simply informed about the decisions shaping our future, but equipped to help make those decisions. An informed community is a powerful community.

Housing

Black households that own their home in Texas

Texas ranks 18th of 39 states measured the same way. Below, every county in Texas, starting with where Black residents are doing best.

Black households that own their home
Texas41.5%
plus or minus 0.4 points
United States44%
plus or minus 0.3 points
All households in Texas: 62.6% (plus or minus 0.3 points). Source: Census Bureau, American Community Survey, survey years 2020 to 2024.
Doing best Chambers County 71.3%, plus or minus 8.2 points. Ranked 1st of 63 counties. What is Chambers County doing that works? Furthest to go: Randall County, 22%. See Chambers County ›

Where you live

Enter your ZIP code or street address to find your county below and the people who decide this for you, by name. SourceLine does not keep the address.

Ranked from doing best

Every county in Texas

63 ranked of 254
Margin of error
1 Chambers County 71.3% plus or minus 8.2 points 81.6%
2 Guadalupe County 71.2% plus or minus 5.5 points 77.8%
3 Bastrop County 69.2% plus or minus 8.7 points 76.5%
4 Fort Bend County 67.8% plus or minus 1.8 points 77%
5 Ellis County 67.6% plus or minus 3.8 points 75.8%
6 Rockwall County 67.1% plus or minus 2.6 points 82.5%
7 Kaufman County 64.7% plus or minus 1.7 points 78.1%
8 Rusk County 64.3% plus or minus 6.1 points 78.8%
9 Brazoria County 63.7% plus or minus 2.4 points 74.1%
10 Hardin County 63.1% plus or minus 7.5 points 82.3%
11 Johnson County 62.1% plus or minus 5.3 points 74.7%
12 Liberty County 61.7% plus or minus 9.1 points 82.3%
13 Hays County 60.6% plus or minus 8.1 points 64.1%
14 Henderson County 60.6% plus or minus 7.9 points 77.8%
15 Wharton County 57.9% plus or minus 9.9 points 72.3%
16 Cass County 57.6% plus or minus 6.6 points 76.6%
17 Upshur County 57.6% plus or minus 6.4 points 80.7%
18 Jasper County 55.8% plus or minus 8.2 points 79%
19 Cherokee County 54.1% plus or minus 5 points 74%
20 Hunt County 53% plus or minus 7.2 points 71.3%
21 Montgomery County 51.2% plus or minus 3.2 points 71.8%
22 Harrison County 50.5% plus or minus 4.5 points 76.9%
23 Victoria County 49.8% plus or minus 8.1 points 65.3%
24 Midland County 49.7% plus or minus 8.6 points 67.6%
25 Robertson County 49.2% plus or minus 2.7 points 72.4%
26 Smith County 49.2% plus or minus 2.6 points 68.8%
27 Washington County 48.7% plus or minus 9.7 points 69.8%
28 Williamson County 46.2% plus or minus 2.7 points 66.4%
29 Jefferson County 45% plus or minus 1.9 points 62.5%
30 Ector County 44.4% plus or minus 6.5 points 64.7%
31 Galveston County 44% plus or minus 1.9 points 67.6%
32 Bell County 43.6% plus or minus 2 points 56.5%
33 El Paso County 42.9% plus or minus 3.1 points 64.2%
34 Bexar County 42.5% plus or minus 1.9 points 58.8%
35 Orange County 42.3% plus or minus 6.6 points 75.2%
36 Limestone County 42.2% plus or minus 4.9 points 72.1%
37 Collin County 41.9% plus or minus 1.8 points 64.5%
38 Denton County 41.1% plus or minus 2.1 points 65.5%
39 Navarro County 41.1% plus or minus 6.1 points 69.4%
40 Lamar County 41% plus or minus 8.4 points 66.1%
41 Anderson County 40.3% plus or minus 4.1 points 72.3%
42 Nueces County 40.1% plus or minus 5.6 points 59.7%
43 Taylor County 39.1% plus or minus 5.7 points 60.5%
44 Gregg County 39% plus or minus 3.6 points 60.3%
45 Bowie County 38.7% plus or minus 3.4 points 63.4%
46 Houston County 38.7% plus or minus 6.9 points 70.6%
47 Tom Green County 38.1% plus or minus 8.6 points 65.1%
48 Walker County 37.7% plus or minus 7.6 points 56.5%
49 Wichita County 37.5% plus or minus 5.7 points 61.4%
50 Dallas County 36.7% plus or minus 0.9 points 50.8%
51 Tarrant County 36.6% plus or minus 1 points 59.3%
52 Harris County 36.4% plus or minus 0.8 points 54.7%
53 Coryell County 35.6% plus or minus 6 points 58.6%
54 Travis County 35.2% plus or minus 2.1 points 52.1%
55 Waller County 34.3% plus or minus 8.4 points 72%
56 Potter County 33.7% plus or minus 6.1 points 57.3%
57 McLennan County 32.8% plus or minus 2.9 points 61.8%
58 Nacogdoches County 32.8% plus or minus 5.9 points 59.3%
59 Lubbock County 30.2% plus or minus 3.4 points 55.5%
60 Grayson County 29.9% plus or minus 7.5 points 66.8%
61 Angelina County 29.7% plus or minus 4.9 points 64%
62 Brazos County 27.4% plus or minus 2.9 points 46.8%
63 Randall County 22% plus or minus 7.2 points 67.9%
Not ranked Andrews County Too small to report: fewer than 1,000 Black households 78.5%
Not ranked Aransas County Too small to report: fewer than 1,000 Black households 76.8%
Not ranked Archer County Too small to report: fewer than 1,000 Black households 84.5%
Not ranked Armstrong County Not published: too few people in the survey 80.2%
Not ranked Atascosa County Too small to report: fewer than 1,000 Black households 77.4%
Not ranked Austin County 65.8% Wide margin of error plus or minus 12.8 points 76.5%
Not ranked Bailey County Too small to report: fewer than 1,000 Black households 79.9%
Not ranked Bandera County Too small to report: fewer than 1,000 Black households 85.9%
Not ranked Baylor County Too small to report: fewer than 1,000 Black households 66.2%
Not ranked Bee County Too small to report: fewer than 1,000 Black households 70.8%
Not ranked Blanco County Too small to report: fewer than 1,000 Black households 76.2%
Not ranked Borden County Too small to report: fewer than 1,000 Black households 66.3%
Not ranked Bosque County Too small to report: fewer than 1,000 Black households 75.8%
Not ranked Brewster County Too small to report: fewer than 1,000 Black households 62.5%
Not ranked Briscoe County Too small to report: fewer than 1,000 Black households 82.8%
Not ranked Brooks County Too small to report: fewer than 1,000 Black households 52.8%
Not ranked Brown County Too small to report: fewer than 1,000 Black households 68.3%
Not ranked Burleson County Too small to report: fewer than 1,000 Black households 81.7%
Not ranked Burnet County Too small to report: fewer than 1,000 Black households 76.3%
Not ranked Caldwell County Too small to report: fewer than 1,000 Black households 75.3%
Not ranked Calhoun County Too small to report: fewer than 1,000 Black households 77.3%
Not ranked Callahan County Too small to report: fewer than 1,000 Black households 80.9%
Not ranked Cameron County Too small to report: fewer than 1,000 Black households 65.2%
Not ranked Camp County Too small to report: fewer than 1,000 Black households 77.5%
Not ranked Carson County Too small to report: fewer than 1,000 Black households 79.2%
Not ranked Castro County Too small to report: fewer than 1,000 Black households 63.6%
Not ranked Childress County Too small to report: fewer than 1,000 Black households 71%
Not ranked Clay County Too small to report: fewer than 1,000 Black households 84%
Not ranked Cochran County Too small to report: fewer than 1,000 Black households 64.6%
Not ranked Coke County Not published: too few people in the survey 71.1%
Not ranked Coleman County Too small to report: fewer than 1,000 Black households 77.2%
Not ranked Collingsworth County Too small to report: fewer than 1,000 Black households 73.8%
Not ranked Colorado County Too small to report: fewer than 1,000 Black households 79.5%
Not ranked Comal County 69.6% Wide margin of error plus or minus 11.9 points 76.6%
Not ranked Comanche County Not published: too few people in the survey 80.4%
Not ranked Concho County Not published: too few people in the survey 80.5%
Not ranked Cooke County Too small to report: fewer than 1,000 Black households 71.8%
Not ranked Cottle County Too small to report: fewer than 1,000 Black households 83.2%
Not ranked Crane County Too small to report: fewer than 1,000 Black households 83.8%
Not ranked Crockett County Not published: too few people in the survey 73.7%
Not ranked Crosby County Too small to report: fewer than 1,000 Black households 68.8%
Not ranked Culberson County Not published: too few people in the survey 70.2%
Not ranked Dallam County Not published: too few people in the survey 64%
Not ranked Dawson County Too small to report: fewer than 1,000 Black households 70.6%
Not ranked Deaf Smith County Too small to report: fewer than 1,000 Black households 66.8%
Not ranked Delta County Too small to report: fewer than 1,000 Black households 82.8%
Not ranked DeWitt County Too small to report: fewer than 1,000 Black households 73.9%
Not ranked Dickens County Too small to report: fewer than 1,000 Black households 79.5%
Not ranked Dimmit County Too small to report: fewer than 1,000 Black households 66.5%
Not ranked Donley County Too small to report: fewer than 1,000 Black households 74.8%
Not ranked Duval County Not published: too few people in the survey 70.4%
Not ranked Eastland County Too small to report: fewer than 1,000 Black households 71.6%
Not ranked Edwards County Not published: too few people in the survey 87.9%
Not ranked Erath County Too small to report: fewer than 1,000 Black households 63.1%
Not ranked Falls County 66.2% Wide margin of error plus or minus 12.2 points 76.5%
Not ranked Fannin County Too small to report: fewer than 1,000 Black households 78.7%
Not ranked Fayette County Too small to report: fewer than 1,000 Black households 79.4%
Not ranked Fisher County Too small to report: fewer than 1,000 Black households 80.4%
Not ranked Floyd County Too small to report: fewer than 1,000 Black households 73.3%
Not ranked Foard County Not published: too few people in the survey 76%
Not ranked Franklin County Too small to report: fewer than 1,000 Black households 82%
Not ranked Freestone County 57% Wide margin of error plus or minus 11.1 points 75.4%
Not ranked Frio County Too small to report: fewer than 1,000 Black households 58.9%
Not ranked Gaines County Too small to report: fewer than 1,000 Black households 74.6%
Not ranked Garza County Too small to report: fewer than 1,000 Black households 70.5%
Not ranked Gillespie County Too small to report: fewer than 1,000 Black households 74.9%
Not ranked Glasscock County Not published: too few people in the survey 68.5%
Not ranked Goliad County Too small to report: fewer than 1,000 Black households 86.8%
Not ranked Gonzales County Too small to report: fewer than 1,000 Black households 66.2%
Not ranked Gray County Too small to report: fewer than 1,000 Black households 76.4%
Not ranked Grimes County Too small to report: fewer than 1,000 Black households 79.9%
Not ranked Hale County Too small to report: fewer than 1,000 Black households 60.5%
Not ranked Hall County Too small to report: fewer than 1,000 Black households 73.6%
Not ranked Hamilton County Too small to report: fewer than 1,000 Black households 78.7%
Not ranked Hansford County Not published: too few people in the survey 81.2%
Not ranked Hardeman County Too small to report: fewer than 1,000 Black households 73.9%
Not ranked Hartley County Not published: too few people in the survey 74.4%
Not ranked Haskell County Too small to report: fewer than 1,000 Black households 73.7%
Not ranked Hemphill County Too small to report: fewer than 1,000 Black households 71.1%
Not ranked Hidalgo County 37.5% Wide margin of error plus or minus 11.1 points 67.5%
Not ranked Hill County Too small to report: fewer than 1,000 Black households 78.2%
Not ranked Hockley County Too small to report: fewer than 1,000 Black households 72.2%
Not ranked Hood County Too small to report: fewer than 1,000 Black households 81.2%
Not ranked Hopkins County 55.6% Wide margin of error plus or minus 12.6 points 71.1%
Not ranked Howard County Too small to report: fewer than 1,000 Black households 69.5%
Not ranked Hudspeth County Too small to report: fewer than 1,000 Black households 73.6%
Not ranked Hutchinson County Too small to report: fewer than 1,000 Black households 83.3%
Not ranked Irion County Not published: too few people in the survey 82.8%
Not ranked Jack County Too small to report: fewer than 1,000 Black households 72.2%
Not ranked Jackson County Too small to report: fewer than 1,000 Black households 70.8%
Not ranked Jeff Davis County Not published: too few people in the survey 88%
Not ranked Jim Hogg County Not published: too few people in the survey 56.4%
Not ranked Jim Wells County Too small to report: fewer than 1,000 Black households 68.5%
Not ranked Jones County Too small to report: fewer than 1,000 Black households 80.4%
Not ranked Karnes County Too small to report: fewer than 1,000 Black households 62.4%
Not ranked Kendall County Too small to report: fewer than 1,000 Black households 79.5%
Not ranked Kenedy County Not published: too few people in the survey 52.7%
Not ranked Kent County Not published: too few people in the survey 79.2%
Not ranked Kerr County Too small to report: fewer than 1,000 Black households 70.1%
Not ranked Kimble County Too small to report: fewer than 1,000 Black households 78.9%
Not ranked King County Not published: too few people in the survey 59.5%
Not ranked Kinney County Not published: too few people in the survey 83.9%
Not ranked Kleberg County Too small to report: fewer than 1,000 Black households 52.5%
Not ranked Knox County Too small to report: fewer than 1,000 Black households 77.4%
Not ranked La Salle County Not published: too few people in the survey 76%
Not ranked Lamb County Too small to report: fewer than 1,000 Black households 74%
Not ranked Lampasas County Too small to report: fewer than 1,000 Black households 80.1%
Not ranked Lavaca County Too small to report: fewer than 1,000 Black households 78.3%
Not ranked Lee County Too small to report: fewer than 1,000 Black households 77.8%
Not ranked Leon County Too small to report: fewer than 1,000 Black households 76.6%
Not ranked Lipscomb County Not published: too few people in the survey 82.4%
Not ranked Live Oak County Not published: too few people in the survey 71.3%
Not ranked Llano County Too small to report: fewer than 1,000 Black households 76.5%
Not ranked Loving County Not published: too few people in the survey 11.1%
Not ranked Lynn County Too small to report: fewer than 1,000 Black households 77%
Not ranked Madison County Too small to report: fewer than 1,000 Black households 75.3%
Not ranked Marion County Too small to report: fewer than 1,000 Black households 78.5%
Not ranked Martin County Too small to report: fewer than 1,000 Black households 78.1%
Not ranked Mason County Not published: too few people in the survey 79.7%
Not ranked Matagorda County 42.7% Wide margin of error plus or minus 12.6 points 68.1%
Not ranked Maverick County Too small to report: fewer than 1,000 Black households 70.5%
Not ranked McCulloch County Too small to report: fewer than 1,000 Black households 66.6%
Not ranked McMullen County Not published: too few people in the survey 78.3%
Not ranked Medina County Too small to report: fewer than 1,000 Black households 83.8%
Not ranked Menard County Not published: too few people in the survey 80.7%
Not ranked Milam County Too small to report: fewer than 1,000 Black households 76.9%
Not ranked Mills County Not published: too few people in the survey 80.3%
Not ranked Mitchell County Too small to report: fewer than 1,000 Black households 78.7%
Not ranked Montague County Not published: too few people in the survey 79.9%
Not ranked Moore County Too small to report: fewer than 1,000 Black households 62.5%
Not ranked Morris County 52.7% Wide margin of error plus or minus 12.6 points 73.9%
Not ranked Motley County Too small to report: fewer than 1,000 Black households 76.5%
Not ranked Newton County Too small to report: fewer than 1,000 Black households 82.9%
Not ranked Nolan County Too small to report: fewer than 1,000 Black households 68.1%
Not ranked Ochiltree County Not published: too few people in the survey 72.7%
Not ranked Oldham County Not published: too few people in the survey 73.6%
Not ranked Palo Pinto County Too small to report: fewer than 1,000 Black households 71%
Not ranked Panola County 72.8% Wide margin of error plus or minus 10.4 points 79.9%
Not ranked Parker County Too small to report: fewer than 1,000 Black households 80.7%
Not ranked Parmer County Too small to report: fewer than 1,000 Black households 72.1%
Not ranked Pecos County Too small to report: fewer than 1,000 Black households 72%
Not ranked Polk County 49% Wide margin of error plus or minus 10.7 points 78.1%
Not ranked Presidio County Too small to report: fewer than 1,000 Black households 77.3%
Not ranked Rains County Too small to report: fewer than 1,000 Black households 82.6%
Not ranked Reagan County Too small to report: fewer than 1,000 Black households 70%
Not ranked Real County Not published: too few people in the survey 78.1%
Not ranked Red River County 42.4% Wide margin of error plus or minus 11.6 points 71.5%
Not ranked Reeves County Too small to report: fewer than 1,000 Black households 73.7%
Not ranked Refugio County Too small to report: fewer than 1,000 Black households 77%
Not ranked Roberts County Too small to report: fewer than 1,000 Black households 85.1%
Not ranked Runnels County Too small to report: fewer than 1,000 Black households 75%
Not ranked Sabine County Too small to report: fewer than 1,000 Black households 85.7%
Not ranked San Augustine County Too small to report: fewer than 1,000 Black households 75.1%
Not ranked San Jacinto County Too small to report: fewer than 1,000 Black households 84.6%
Not ranked San Patricio County Too small to report: fewer than 1,000 Black households 66.9%
Not ranked San Saba County Not published: too few people in the survey 71.7%
Not ranked Schleicher County Too small to report: fewer than 1,000 Black households 84.3%
Not ranked Scurry County Too small to report: fewer than 1,000 Black households 76.8%
Not ranked Shackelford County Too small to report: fewer than 1,000 Black households 78.7%
Not ranked Shelby County 56.2% Wide margin of error plus or minus 13.2 points 74%
Not ranked Sherman County Not published: too few people in the survey 76.3%
Not ranked Somervell County Not published: too few people in the survey 80%
Not ranked Starr County Too small to report: fewer than 1,000 Black households 69.5%
Not ranked Stephens County Too small to report: fewer than 1,000 Black households 79.2%
Not ranked Sterling County Not published: too few people in the survey 77.7%
Not ranked Stonewall County Not published: too few people in the survey 84.6%
Not ranked Sutton County Not published: too few people in the survey 76%
Not ranked Swisher County Too small to report: fewer than 1,000 Black households 66.4%
Not ranked Terrell County Not published: too few people in the survey 89.4%
Not ranked Terry County Too small to report: fewer than 1,000 Black households 66.5%
Not ranked Throckmorton County Not published: too few people in the survey 68%
Not ranked Titus County 40.3% Wide margin of error plus or minus 10.5 points 70.6%
Not ranked Trinity County Too small to report: fewer than 1,000 Black households 79.4%
Not ranked Tyler County Too small to report: fewer than 1,000 Black households 81.2%
Not ranked Upton County Too small to report: fewer than 1,000 Black households 77.2%
Not ranked Uvalde County Too small to report: fewer than 1,000 Black households 70.6%
Not ranked Val Verde County Too small to report: fewer than 1,000 Black households 69.1%
Not ranked Van Zandt County Too small to report: fewer than 1,000 Black households 81.5%
Not ranked Ward County Too small to report: fewer than 1,000 Black households 78.5%
Not ranked Webb County Too small to report: fewer than 1,000 Black households 64.7%
Not ranked Wheeler County Too small to report: fewer than 1,000 Black households 76.2%
Not ranked Wilbarger County Too small to report: fewer than 1,000 Black households 67.2%
Not ranked Willacy County Not published: too few people in the survey 74.7%
Not ranked Wilson County Too small to report: fewer than 1,000 Black households 84.7%
Not ranked Winkler County Too small to report: fewer than 1,000 Black households 86%
Not ranked Wise County Too small to report: fewer than 1,000 Black households 81.4%
Not ranked Wood County Too small to report: fewer than 1,000 Black households 80.1%
Not ranked Yoakum County Not published: too few people in the survey 66.8%
Not ranked Young County Too small to report: fewer than 1,000 Black households 74.1%
Not ranked Zapata County Too small to report: fewer than 1,000 Black households 72%
Not ranked Zavala County Too small to report: fewer than 1,000 Black households 69%

Ranked: the 63 counties measured in survey years 2020 to 2024 with at least 1,000 Black households and with a margin of error of 10 points or less. Places below that line are still listed, with the reason.

Who decides

From you up to Congress. Look up your address above and each step fills in with the people who hold that seat for you.

  1. You and your neighbors Know your rights as a renter or owner, check your property tax assessment, and show up when zoning is decided.

    Ask: Is my assessment right, and when is the deadline to appeal it?

  2. Your mayor, council and county commission Decide zoning, property taxes, code enforcement and how local housing money is spent.

    Ask: What is being built here, who can afford it, and who decided?

  3. Your state legislators Write landlord and tenant law and decide where the housing tax credit goes.

    Ask: Where did our state place its housing tax credits last year?

  4. Your members of Congress Fund rent help, public housing and the housing tax credit.

    Ask: How long is the wait for rent help in our county?

What you can do

  1. This weekLook up your property assessment or reread your lease, and write down any deadline.
  2. The next date that mattersThe next zoning hearing or property tax appeal deadline in your county.
  3. Where your voice is countedRaise what matters where you live on SourceLine issues. Only confirmed residents are counted, and SourceLine shares the totals, never names, with the body that decides.
Method and sources

Black households that own their home. Source: Census Bureau, American Community Survey, survey years 2020 to 2024.

The margin of error is how far the true figure could be from the one shown. Surveys ask some people, not everyone, so smaller places have wider margins. A place with too few people to measure well is listed but not ranked.

Population, voting age population, citizens of voting age, registered voters and people who voted are different counts. Each page says which one it uses.

Who decides: the people named come from SourceLine’s record of officeholders for the address you enter. Where SourceLine hasn’t updated a level for your area yet, that step says so.

About these figures

Every figure on this page shows the year it describes. Public agencies release their numbers on their own schedules, often a year or more after the work of counting is done. The Census Bureau, for example, publishes its five year community survey each December, and the national reading test is given every two years. That is why some figures are not from this year. SourceLine updates each one as soon as the agency publishes it.

For some counties and small towns, SourceLine has not found meeting records online. Where it has not, we add them as they become available. A page that says SourceLine hasn’t updated a record yet means exactly that.