Where you live
Enter your ZIP code or street address to find your county below and the people who decide this for you, by name. SourceLine does not keep the address.
Ranked from doing best
Every county in Minnesota
| Margin of error | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Washington County | 65.2% | plus or minus 3.6 points | 81.3% |
| 2 | Anoka County | 46.9% | plus or minus 3.5 points | 80.2% |
| 3 | Dakota County | 38.8% | plus or minus 4.3 points | 74.9% |
| 4 | Hennepin County | 27.8% | plus or minus 1.6 points | 62.7% |
| 5 | Olmsted County | 24.1% | plus or minus 5.9 points | 70.6% |
| 6 | Stearns County | 21.9% | plus or minus 6.4 points | 67.9% |
| 7 | St. Louis County | 21.6% | plus or minus 7.7 points | 71.2% |
| 8 | Ramsey County | 21.2% | plus or minus 2.1 points | 60.6% |
| 9 | Blue Earth County | 9.3% | plus or minus 6.7 points | 61.4% |
| Not ranked | Aitkin County | Too small to report: fewer than 1,000 Black households | 85.3% | |
| Not ranked | Becker County | Too small to report: fewer than 1,000 Black households | 77.2% | |
| Not ranked | Beltrami County | Too small to report: fewer than 1,000 Black households | 70.1% | |
| Not ranked | Benton County | Too small to report: fewer than 1,000 Black households | 66.7% | |
| Not ranked | Big Stone County | Not published: too few people in the survey | 79.7% | |
| Not ranked | Brown County | Too small to report: fewer than 1,000 Black households | 78.9% | |
| Not ranked | Carlton County | Too small to report: fewer than 1,000 Black households | 80% | |
| Not ranked | Carver County | Too small to report: fewer than 1,000 Black households | 81.5% | |
| Not ranked | Cass County | Too small to report: fewer than 1,000 Black households | 86.2% | |
| Not ranked | Chippewa County | Too small to report: fewer than 1,000 Black households | 72.3% | |
| Not ranked | Chisago County | Too small to report: fewer than 1,000 Black households | 85.9% | |
| Not ranked | Clay County | 22.2% Wide margin of error | plus or minus 12.7 points | 65.9% |
| Not ranked | Clearwater County | Not published: too few people in the survey | 80.1% | |
| Not ranked | Cook County | Too small to report: fewer than 1,000 Black households | 77.7% | |
| Not ranked | Cottonwood County | Too small to report: fewer than 1,000 Black households | 74.4% | |
| Not ranked | Crow Wing County | Too small to report: fewer than 1,000 Black households | 77% | |
| Not ranked | Dodge County | Too small to report: fewer than 1,000 Black households | 86.6% | |
| Not ranked | Douglas County | Too small to report: fewer than 1,000 Black households | 76.5% | |
| Not ranked | Faribault County | Too small to report: fewer than 1,000 Black households | 79.2% | |
| Not ranked | Fillmore County | Too small to report: fewer than 1,000 Black households | 82.6% | |
| Not ranked | Freeborn County | Too small to report: fewer than 1,000 Black households | 79.5% | |
| Not ranked | Goodhue County | Too small to report: fewer than 1,000 Black households | 78.8% | |
| Not ranked | Grant County | Too small to report: fewer than 1,000 Black households | 79.2% | |
| Not ranked | Houston County | Not published: too few people in the survey | 83.4% | |
| Not ranked | Hubbard County | Too small to report: fewer than 1,000 Black households | 83.1% | |
| Not ranked | Isanti County | Too small to report: fewer than 1,000 Black households | 83.7% | |
| Not ranked | Itasca County | Too small to report: fewer than 1,000 Black households | 83% | |
| Not ranked | Jackson County | Too small to report: fewer than 1,000 Black households | 80.1% | |
| Not ranked | Kanabec County | Too small to report: fewer than 1,000 Black households | 84.5% | |
| Not ranked | Kandiyohi County | Too small to report: fewer than 1,000 Black households | 72.5% | |
| Not ranked | Kittson County | Too small to report: fewer than 1,000 Black households | 82.9% | |
| Not ranked | Koochiching County | Not published: too few people in the survey | 80.4% | |
| Not ranked | Lac qui Parle County | Too small to report: fewer than 1,000 Black households | 82.5% | |
| Not ranked | Lake County | Not published: too few people in the survey | 83.5% | |
| Not ranked | Lake of the Woods County | Not published: too few people in the survey | 81.8% | |
| Not ranked | Le Sueur County | Too small to report: fewer than 1,000 Black households | 81% | |
| Not ranked | Lincoln County | Not published: too few people in the survey | 81.4% | |
| Not ranked | Lyon County | Too small to report: fewer than 1,000 Black households | 72.5% | |
| Not ranked | Mahnomen County | Too small to report: fewer than 1,000 Black households | 73.3% | |
| Not ranked | Marshall County | Too small to report: fewer than 1,000 Black households | 83% | |
| Not ranked | Martin County | Too small to report: fewer than 1,000 Black households | 68.9% | |
| Not ranked | McLeod County | Too small to report: fewer than 1,000 Black households | 77.4% | |
| Not ranked | Meeker County | Too small to report: fewer than 1,000 Black households | 79.3% | |
| Not ranked | Mille Lacs County | Too small to report: fewer than 1,000 Black households | 77.9% | |
| Not ranked | Morrison County | Too small to report: fewer than 1,000 Black households | 80.6% | |
| Not ranked | Mower County | Too small to report: fewer than 1,000 Black households | 77.6% | |
| Not ranked | Murray County | Too small to report: fewer than 1,000 Black households | 82.2% | |
| Not ranked | Nicollet County | Too small to report: fewer than 1,000 Black households | 72.2% | |
| Not ranked | Nobles County | Too small to report: fewer than 1,000 Black households | 74.2% | |
| Not ranked | Norman County | Too small to report: fewer than 1,000 Black households | 79.4% | |
| Not ranked | Otter Tail County | Too small to report: fewer than 1,000 Black households | 79.5% | |
| Not ranked | Pennington County | Too small to report: fewer than 1,000 Black households | 72.2% | |
| Not ranked | Pine County | Too small to report: fewer than 1,000 Black households | 81.6% | |
| Not ranked | Pipestone County | Too small to report: fewer than 1,000 Black households | 80.8% | |
| Not ranked | Polk County | Too small to report: fewer than 1,000 Black households | 71.3% | |
| Not ranked | Pope County | Too small to report: fewer than 1,000 Black households | 83.5% | |
| Not ranked | Red Lake County | Not published: too few people in the survey | 83.4% | |
| Not ranked | Redwood County | Too small to report: fewer than 1,000 Black households | 78.4% | |
| Not ranked | Renville County | Too small to report: fewer than 1,000 Black households | 80.2% | |
| Not ranked | Rice County | 17.6% Wide margin of error | plus or minus 21.7 points | 76.3% |
| Not ranked | Rock County | Not published: too few people in the survey | 76.6% | |
| Not ranked | Roseau County | Too small to report: fewer than 1,000 Black households | 79.2% | |
| Not ranked | Scott County | 51.7% Wide margin of error | plus or minus 10.3 points | 83.8% |
| Not ranked | Sherburne County | 28% Wide margin of error | plus or minus 14.6 points | 83.2% |
| Not ranked | Sibley County | Too small to report: fewer than 1,000 Black households | 80.8% | |
| Not ranked | Steele County | Too small to report: fewer than 1,000 Black households | 79.4% | |
| Not ranked | Stevens County | Too small to report: fewer than 1,000 Black households | 63.4% | |
| Not ranked | Swift County | Too small to report: fewer than 1,000 Black households | 72.4% | |
| Not ranked | Todd County | Too small to report: fewer than 1,000 Black households | 83% | |
| Not ranked | Traverse County | Too small to report: fewer than 1,000 Black households | 81.8% | |
| Not ranked | Wabasha County | Too small to report: fewer than 1,000 Black households | 83.3% | |
| Not ranked | Wadena County | Too small to report: fewer than 1,000 Black households | 73.6% | |
| Not ranked | Waseca County | Too small to report: fewer than 1,000 Black households | 80.7% | |
| Not ranked | Watonwan County | Not published: too few people in the survey | 77.8% | |
| Not ranked | Wilkin County | Too small to report: fewer than 1,000 Black households | 79.7% | |
| Not ranked | Winona County | Too small to report: fewer than 1,000 Black households | 69.5% | |
| Not ranked | Wright County | Too small to report: fewer than 1,000 Black households | 84.1% | |
| Not ranked | Yellow Medicine County | Too small to report: fewer than 1,000 Black households | 84% |
Ranked: the 9 counties measured in survey years 2020 to 2024 with at least 1,000 Black households and with a margin of error of 10 points or less. Places below that line are still listed, with the reason.
Who decides
From you up to Congress. Look up your address above and each step fills in with the people who hold that seat for you.
You and your neighbors Know your rights as a renter or owner, check your property tax assessment, and show up when zoning is decided.
Ask: Is my assessment right, and when is the deadline to appeal it?
Your mayor, council and county commission Decide zoning, property taxes, code enforcement and how local housing money is spent.
Ask: What is being built here, who can afford it, and who decided?
Your state legislators Write landlord and tenant law and decide where the housing tax credit goes.
Ask: Where did our state place its housing tax credits last year?
Your members of Congress Fund rent help, public housing and the housing tax credit.
Ask: How long is the wait for rent help in our county?
What you can do
- This weekLook up your property assessment or reread your lease, and write down any deadline.
- The next date that mattersThe next zoning hearing or property tax appeal deadline in your county.
- Where your voice is countedRaise what matters where you live on SourceLine issues. Only confirmed residents are counted, and SourceLine shares the totals, never names, with the body that decides.
Method and sources
Black households that own their home. Source: Census Bureau, American Community Survey, survey years 2020 to 2024.
The margin of error is how far the true figure could be from the one shown. Surveys ask some people, not everyone, so smaller places have wider margins. A place with too few people to measure well is listed but not ranked.
Population, voting age population, citizens of voting age, registered voters and people who voted are different counts. Each page says which one it uses.
Who decides: the people named come from SourceLine’s record of officeholders for the address you enter. Where SourceLine hasn’t updated a level for your area yet, that step says so.